Roboflow

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct: Overview

Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is a mid-tier large language model from Anthropic, released on June 30, 2026, as the latest model in the Sonnet series and a direct successor to Claude Sonnet 4.6. It is a hybrid reasoning model designed primarily for agentic workflows, software coding, and professional tasks. The model features a 1 million token context window, a 128k maximum output token limit, and runs adaptive thinking by default, giving API users fine-grained control over reasoning effort across five levels (low, medium, high, max, and extra-high). It uses an updated tokenizer shared with Opus 4.7 and later models, which produces approximately 30% more tokens for equivalent text compared to earlier Claude models. On benchmarks, Sonnet 5 scores 63.2% on agentic coding and 81.2% on OSWorld, narrowing the gap with Opus 4.8 while remaining at Sonnet-tier pricing.

The model supports text and image input with text output, and accepts tools including browsers and terminals for autonomous multi-step task execution. Anthropic's safety evaluations report that Sonnet 5 shows a lower rate of undesirable behaviors than Sonnet 4.6 and is generally safer in agentic contexts, with improved resistance to prompt injection and reduced sycophancy. Cybersecurity safeguards equivalent to those on Opus 4.7 and 4.8 are active, though Anthropic notes the model was not deliberately trained on cybersecurity tasks. The model is proprietary and API-only, with no open weights.

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct is a 7-billion parameter vision-language model from Alibaba’s QwenLM team, released on January 26, 2025 under the Apache 2.0 license. It is the instruction-tuned variant of the 7B scale in the Qwen2.5-VL family, designed to process multimodal inputs such as text, images, charts, documents, and video. The model enables structured outputs—including JSON for structured content and bounding boxes for visual localization. Weights are publicly available on Hugging Face and GitHub, making it suitable for both research and applied multimodal use.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Sonnet 5Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
OrganizationAnthropicQwen
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2026Jan 2025
Context Window1.0M33K
Parameters7B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00
Output $/1M$10.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Multi-Label Classification
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
70.15%
52.24%
Avg Response Time3.90s47.64s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.1K
Median output tokens61
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0048
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
60%(9/15)
Document Understanding
66.7%(6/9)
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
0%(0/10)
Object Understanding
92.9%(13/14)
57.1%(8/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
57.9%(11/19)
OCR
Overall Score
83.84%
Avg Response Time2.77s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens642
Median output tokens64
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0019
Focused Scene OCR
88.9%(88/99)
Handwritten Math
50%(5/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
80%(24/30)
VQA & Extraction
80%(48/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology