Roboflow

Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 and GPT-5.6 Sol side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Open Prompt, OCR, Classification, and Image Captioning.

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5
Run to compare this model.
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Sol
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol on Vision Evals

GPT-5.6 Sol scores higher on 3 of the six Vision Evals tasks.

The widest gap is Object Detection, where GPT-5.6 Sol leads 68.2% to 36.1%.

Overall, Claude Sonnet 5 averages 66.4% (#21 of 31) against 76.9% (#10 of 31) for GPT-5.6 Sol.

Claude Sonnet 5 is both cheaper ($0.0064 vs $0.0089 per sample) and faster (4.8s vs 11.7s per sample).

Claude Sonnet 5GPT-5.6 Sol

Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol Comparison Table

Evals updated August 20, 2026Pricing updated August 24, 2026

PropertyClaude Sonnet 5GPT-5.6 Sol
OrganizationAnthropicOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2026Jul 2026
Context Window1.0M1.5M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$2.00
Output $/1M$10.00$10.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
66.4%
76.9%
Avg cost / sample$0.0064$0.0089
Avg speed / sample4.84s11.72s
By task
Object Detection
36.1%
$0.011
68.2%
$0.016
Counting
56.8%
$0.0030
73.0%
$0.0048
Identification
81.3%
$0.0027
81.3%
$0.0027
OCR
91.7%
$0.0078
90.7%
$0.011
Data Extraction
89.7%
$0.0030
82.5%
$0.0033
Reasoning (low)
43.0%
$0.0032
65.6%
$0.0042
Reasoning (high)
43.0%
$0.0043
72.2%
$0.0057

Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol: Overview

Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is a mid-tier large language model from Anthropic, released on June 30, 2026, as the latest model in the Sonnet series and a direct successor to Claude Sonnet 4.6. It is a hybrid reasoning model designed primarily for agentic workflows, software coding, and professional tasks. The model features a 1 million token context window, a 128k maximum output token limit, and runs adaptive thinking by default, giving API users fine-grained control over reasoning effort across five levels (low, medium, high, max, and extra-high). It uses an updated tokenizer shared with Opus 4.7 and later models, which produces approximately 30% more tokens for equivalent text compared to earlier Claude models. On benchmarks, Sonnet 5 scores 63.2% on agentic coding and 81.2% on OSWorld, narrowing the gap with Opus 4.8 while remaining at Sonnet-tier pricing.

The model supports text and image input with text output, and accepts tools including browsers and terminals for autonomous multi-step task execution. Anthropic's safety evaluations report that Sonnet 5 shows a lower rate of undesirable behaviors than Sonnet 4.6 and is generally safer in agentic contexts, with improved resistance to prompt injection and reduced sycophancy. Cybersecurity safeguards equivalent to those on Opus 4.7 and 4.8 are active, though Anthropic notes the model was not deliberately trained on cybersecurity tasks. The model is proprietary and API-only, with no open weights.

GPT-5.6 Sol

GPT-5.6 Sol is the flagship model in OpenAI's GPT-5.6 family, which also includes Terra (a balanced everyday-work tier) and Luna (a fast, cost-efficient tier). Sol is designed for demanding reasoning, long-horizon agentic workflows, software engineering, computer use, scientific research, and cybersecurity tasks. It introduces two new capability modes: a "max" reasoning effort setting that allocates additional compute time for difficult problems, and an "ultra" mode that coordinates multiple subagents in parallel to accelerate complex, multi-step work. The model supports native multimodal input, allowing it to process screenshots, diagrams, charts, documents, and photographs alongside text. A reported context window of approximately 1.5 million tokens enables processing of large codebases, lengthy research documents, and extended agentic sessions.

GPT-5.6 Sol was announced on June 26, 2026, initially in a limited preview for trusted partners, and reached general availability on July 9, 2026. On the Agents' Last Exam benchmark, which evaluates long-running professional workflows across 55 fields, Sol scores 53.6. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, which tests command-line agentic coding workflows, Sol Ultra achieves 91.9%. The model also demonstrates gains in life sciences evaluations, including long-horizon genomics and quantitative biology analyses. OpenAI paired the release with its most extensive safety evaluation to date, combining human red teaming with large-scale automated testing, and classified Sol as High capability in both cybersecurity and biological risk under its Preparedness Framework, though it does not cross the Critical threshold in either category.

Frequently Asked Questions

On Roboflow's Vision Evals, GPT-5.6 Sol performed better. It scores higher on 3 of the six vision tasks and averages 76.9% (#10 of 31) against 66.4% (#21 of 31) for Claude Sonnet 5. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.

No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark, GPT-5.6 Sol leads with 68.2% against 36.1%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.

Claude Sonnet 5 is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.0064 per sample against $0.0089. Claude Sonnet 5 is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output; GPT-5.6 Sol is priced at $2.00 per 1M input tokens and $10.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.

Claude Sonnet 5 is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 4.8s per inference against 11.7s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for object detection and open prompts in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.