Roboflow

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemma 4 12B

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 and Gemma 4 12B side-by-side.

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemma 4 12B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.

Models in this comparison

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemma 4 12B: Overview

Claude Sonnet 5

Claude Sonnet 5 is a mid-tier large language model from Anthropic, released on June 30, 2026, as the latest model in the Sonnet series and a direct successor to Claude Sonnet 4.6. It is a hybrid reasoning model designed primarily for agentic workflows, software coding, and professional tasks. The model features a 1 million token context window, a 128k maximum output token limit, and runs adaptive thinking by default, giving API users fine-grained control over reasoning effort across five levels (low, medium, high, max, and extra-high). It uses an updated tokenizer shared with Opus 4.7 and later models, which produces approximately 30% more tokens for equivalent text compared to earlier Claude models. On benchmarks, Sonnet 5 scores 63.2% on agentic coding and 81.2% on OSWorld, narrowing the gap with Opus 4.8 while remaining at Sonnet-tier pricing.

The model supports text and image input with text output, and accepts tools including browsers and terminals for autonomous multi-step task execution. Anthropic's safety evaluations report that Sonnet 5 shows a lower rate of undesirable behaviors than Sonnet 4.6 and is generally safer in agentic contexts, with improved resistance to prompt injection and reduced sycophancy. Cybersecurity safeguards equivalent to those on Opus 4.7 and 4.8 are active, though Anthropic notes the model was not deliberately trained on cybersecurity tasks. The model is proprietary and API-only, with no open weights.

Gemma 4 12B

Gemma 4 12B is an open-weight multimodal model from Google in the Gemma 4 family. It is intended for text and image understanding tasks such as visual question answering, OCR, captioning, and document understanding, with a smaller parameter footprint than the larger Gemma 4 variants.

This entry is connected to Roboflow Playground vision evals for comparison. No runnable Playground workflow is configured yet, so the model page is used for discovery and benchmark context rather than direct hosted inference.

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Gemma 4 12B Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Sonnet 5Gemma 4 12B
OrganizationAnthropicGoogle
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2026Jun 2026
Context Window1.0M
Parameters12B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00
Output $/1M$10.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemo
OCRDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
70.15%
62.69%
Avg Response Time3.90s6.88s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.1K
Median output tokens61
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0048
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
73.3%(11/15)
Document Understanding
66.7%(6/9)
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
92.9%(13/14)
78.6%(11/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
57.9%(11/19)
OCR
Overall Score
83.84%
Avg Response Time2.77s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens642
Median output tokens64
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0019
Focused Scene OCR
88.9%(88/99)
Handwritten Math
50%(5/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
80%(24/30)
VQA & Extraction
80%(48/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology