Roboflow

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen

Gemini 4 Hydrogen: 87.3% average across five Vision Evals tasks (#3 of 69 models). We have not run Claude Sonnet 4.6 through Roboflow's Vision Evals, so there is no head-to-head score. Run both on your own image below.

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemini 4 Hydrogen
Run to compare this model.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen Comparison Table

Evals updated November 12, 2026Pricing updated November 13, 2026

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 4 Hydrogen
OrganizationAnthropicGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2026Nov 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
ParametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$3.00No published price
Output $/1M$15.00No published price
Vision Tasks
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedNot listed
Document Question AnsweringSupportedNot listed
Image TaggingSupportedNot listed
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedNot listed
Promptable Concept SegmentationNot listedDemo
Both support 6 more tasks
Model Features
Both support 3 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
OverallNot evaluated
87.3%
Avg cost / sample–$0.0094
Avg speed / sample–13.23s
By task
Object Detection (low)–
81.0%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.3 to 81.9
$0.016
Object Detection (high)–
83.3%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.4 to 83.8
$0.022
Counting (low)–
83.8%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.4 to 86.5
$0.0041
Counting (high)–
84.2%
±2.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.4 to 87.8
$0.012
Identification (low)–
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
$0.0030
Identification (high)–
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
$0.0039
OCR (low)–
86.7%
$0.0089
by category
Single value
78.7%
Transcription
96.1%
Structured JSON
93.6%
Text localization
83.9%
OCR (high)–
87.2%
$0.026
by category
Single value
80.9%
Transcription
95.3%
Structured JSON
93.1%
Text localization
83.7%
Reasoning (low)–
88.1%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.4 to 88.7
$0.0046
Reasoning (high)–
91.8%
±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 91.4 to 92.0
$0.013

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen: Overview

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is Anthropic's mid-tier large language model, released February 17, 2026, designed to balance performance, cost, and versatility for professional and developer use. It supports text and vision-based tasks with advanced reasoning, agentic capabilities, and Adaptive Thinking — a mode where the model dynamically scales its internal reasoning depth. A beta context window of up to 1,000,000 tokens (200K standard) enables processing of entire codebases or document collections in a single request. Parameters are undisclosed.

Optimized for coding, computer use, long-context reasoning, agent planning, and knowledge work, Sonnet 4.6 delivers a full generational upgrade over Sonnet 4.5 and approaches Opus 4.5-level performance across many benchmarks at a fraction of the cost. It is the default model on Claude.ai, Claude Cowork, and is available via API and major cloud platforms — making it well suited for production workloads requiring strong reasoning without flagship pricing.

Gemini 4 Hydrogen

Gemini 4 Hydrogen is a multimodal model from Google, positioned as a successor to Gemini 3.8 Flash with stronger agent and coding capabilities at Flash-class speed.