Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K3
Compare Claude Opus 4.8 and Kimi K3 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Classification, OCR, Object Detection, and Open Prompt.
Compare Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K3 live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K3 on Vision Evals
Claude Opus 4.8 scores higher on 4 of the six Vision Evals tasks.
The widest gap is Object Detection, where Kimi K3 leads 51.9% to 38.6%.
Overall, Claude Opus 4.8 averages 66.8% (#19 of 30) against 66.5% (#20 of 30) for Kimi K3.
Kimi K3 is cheaper ($0.011 vs $0.016 per sample), while Claude Opus 4.8 is faster (5.2s vs 12.7s per sample).
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K3 Comparison Table
Evals updated August 14, 2026Pricing updated August 18, 2026
| Property | Claude Opus 4.8 | Kimi K3 |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Anthropic | Moonshot AI |
| Category | closed | open |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | May 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Context Window | 1.0M | 1.0M |
| Parameters | 2.8T | |
| License | Proprietary | Modified MIT |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $5.00 | $3.00 |
| Output $/1M | $25.00 | $15.00 |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Chart Question Answering | ||
| Classification | Demo | Demo |
| Document Question Answering | ||
| Image Tagging | ||
| Multi-Label Classification | ||
| Object Detection | Demo | Demo |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Model Features | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 6 vision tasks, pooled at low effort | ||
| Overall | 66.8% | 66.5% |
| Avg cost / sample | $0.016 | $0.011 |
| Avg speed / sample | 5.20s | 12.71s |
| By task | ||
| Object Detection | 38.6% $0.026 | 51.9% $0.020 |
| Counting | 52.7% $0.0076 | 46.0% $0.0046 |
| Identification | 75.0% $0.0067 | 81.3% $0.0041 |
| OCR | 93.8% $0.020 | 93.0% $0.0094 |
| Data Extraction | 87.6% $0.0076 | 84.5% $0.0046 |
| Reasoning (low) | 53.0% $0.0078 | 42.4% $0.0044 |
| Reasoning (high) | 52.3% $0.0078 | 74.2% $0.037 |
Claude Opus 4.8 vs Kimi K3: Overview
Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic's most capable generally available large language model, released on May 28, 2026 as an incremental upgrade to Claude Opus 4.7. The model accepts text and image inputs and produces text outputs, with a 1 million token context window on the Claude API, Amazon Bedrock, and Google Cloud Vertex AI (200k tokens on Microsoft Foundry) and up to 128k max output tokens. It uses adaptive thinking and supports adjustable effort tiers — high by default, with extra and max tiers available for more demanding tasks. A fast mode operates at approximately 2.5x standard speed. The model is described by Anthropic as a hybrid reasoning model designed for advanced coding, agentic workflows, long-context reasoning, and professional knowledge work.
Key behavioral improvements over Opus 4.7 include substantially reduced rates of unreported code flaws, improved honesty in self-assessment, and better tool-calling reliability. On Anthropic's Super-Agent benchmark, Opus 4.8 completes every case end-to-end, and it scores 84% on Online-Mind2Web for computer-use and browser-agent tasks. It achieves 88.6% on SWE-bench Verified and 69.2% on SWE-bench Pro. Alongside the model, Anthropic launched Dynamic Workflows in Claude Code (research preview), which enables Claude to orchestrate hundreds of parallel subagents for codebase-scale tasks such as large migrations. The Messages API was also updated to accept mid-task system messages without breaking prompt caching, improving support for long-running agentic pipelines.
Kimi K3 is a sparse Mixture-of-Experts large language model developed by Moonshot AI, with 2.8 trillion total parameters and a 1-million-token context window. The model activates 16 out of 896 experts per token using the Stable LatentMoE framework, and is built on two architectural innovations: Kimi Delta Attention (KDA), a hybrid linear attention mechanism that enables up to 6.3x faster decoding in long-context settings, and Attention Residuals (AttnRes), which selectively retrieves representations across model depth and delivers roughly 25% higher training efficiency. Together with refined training and data recipes, these structural advances yield approximately 2.5x better overall scaling efficiency compared to its predecessor Kimi K2. The model applies quantization-aware training from the supervised fine-tuning stage onward, using MXFP4 weights with MXFP8 activations for hardware compatibility. Thinking mode is always enabled at launch, with reasoning effort configurable via the reasoning_effort field.
Kimi K3 supports native visual understanding alongside text, accepting image inputs for tasks that combine software engineering and visual reasoning. It targets long-horizon coding, knowledge work, and agentic workflows, and ships in two variants: K3 Max for general chat and agent tasks, and K3 Swarm Max for large-scale parallel processing across many coordinated sub-agents. The model is compatible with the OpenAI SDK via an OpenAI-compatible API. Full model weights are scheduled for release by July 27, 2026 under a Modified MIT license, following the open-weight pattern established by the Kimi K2 model family. A technical report with full architecture, training, and evaluation details is expected to accompany the weights release.
Frequently Asked Questions
On Roboflow's Vision Evals, Claude Opus 4.8 performed better. It scores higher on 4 of the six vision tasks and averages 66.8% (#19 of 30) against 66.5% (#20 of 30) for Kimi K3. These scores measure vision capabilities only; either model may perform differently on work outside this benchmark's tasks.
No. On the Vision Evals Object Detection benchmark, Kimi K3 leads with 51.9% against 38.6%. This is the widest gap between the two models across the benchmark's tasks.
Kimi K3 is cheaper to run. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals task mix it averaged $0.011 per sample against $0.016. Claude Opus 4.8 is priced at $5.00 per 1M input tokens and $25.00 per 1M output; Kimi K3 is priced at $3.00 per 1M input tokens and $15.00 per 1M output. Actual costs depend on your image sizes, prompts, and output length.
Claude Opus 4.8 is faster. Across Roboflow's Vision Evals it averaged 5.2s per inference against 12.7s. Latency varies with image size, prompt length, and provider load, so treat these as relative rather than guaranteed figures.
Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and image classification in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.