Roboflow

Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-5 Mini

Claude Fable 5.2: 86.5% average across five Vision Evals tasks (#2 of 67 models). We have not run GPT-5 Mini through Roboflow's Vision Evals, so there is no head-to-head score.

Compare Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-5 Mini live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-5 Mini Comparison Table

Evals updated November 10, 2026Pricing updated November 10, 2026

PropertyClaude Fable 5.2GPT-5 Mini
OrganizationAnthropicOpenAI
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateNov 2026Aug 2025
Context Window1.0M400K
ParametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$8.00$0.250
Output $/1M$40.00$2.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningSupportedDemo
ClassificationSupportedDemo
Object DetectionSupportedDemo
OCRSupportedDemo
Visual Question AnsweringSupportedDemo
Both support 5 more tasks
Model Features
Both support 3 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
Overall
86.5%
Not evaluated
Avg cost / sample$0.031–
Avg speed / sample9.33s–
By task
Object Detection (low)
81.6%
±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.2 to 81.9
$0.048
–
Object Detection (high)
83.3%
±0.5, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.8 to 83.7
$0.055
–
Counting (low)
86.5%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 86.5 to 86.5
$0.015
–
Counting (high)
92.8%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 91.9 to 94.6
$0.021
–
Identification (low)
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
$0.011
–
Identification (high)
94.8%
±1.6, Mean of 3 runs, range 93.8 to 96.9
$0.012
–
OCR (low)
79.5%
$0.030
–
by category
Single value
64.8%
Transcription
94.7%
Structured JSON
92.8%
Text localization
74.5%
OCR (high)
84.8%
$0.043
–
by category
Single value
77.4%
Transcription
97.9%
Structured JSON
94.1%
Text localization
72.9%
Reasoning (low)
88.1%
±1.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 86.8 to 89.4
$0.016
–
Reasoning (high)
92.0%
±1.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 91.4 to 93.4
$0.024
–

Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-5 Mini: Overview

Claude Fable 5.2

Claude Fable 5.2 is a proprietary multimodal model from Anthropic, released on November 9, 2026. It accepts text and images and produces text, with a one million token context window and up to 128,000 output tokens. Adaptive thinking is always enabled, with an effort setting that controls reasoning. Anthropic positions Fable for demanding reasoning and long-running technical work, including coding and analysis of visual inputs.

Fable 5.2 succeeds Fable 5.1. Anthropic reports improvements in coding, reasoning, and vision, with output generation up to 30% faster than its predecessor. Fable and Mythos 5.2 share an underlying model, with additional cybersecurity and biology safeguards applied to Fable. Model weights are not publicly released.

GPT-5 Mini

GPT-5 Mini, released by OpenAI on August 7, 2025, is a mid-tier variant of the GPT-5 family that balances cost, speed, and capability. It is multimodal, supporting both text and image inputs, and offers a substantial input context window of ~400,000 tokens with output lengths up to ~128,000 tokens. While less powerful than the full GPT-5, it inherits its safety tuning, instruction-following improvements, and multimodal reasoning, making it a practical choice for developers who need large context handling without the expense of premium models.

GPT-5 Mini is optimized for affordability while retaining strong reasoning performance. Benchmarks show it outperforming earlier models such as GPT-4o on many multimodal and medical VQA tasks, though it lags behind GPT-5 on the most complex problems. Ideal use cases include prototyping, scalable content generation, document analysis, and mid-range reasoning tasks where efficiency and context capacity matter more than top-tier accuracy.