Roboflow

Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Compare Claude Opus 4 and Qwen3.7 Plus side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Object Detection, Open Prompt, and Classification.

Compare Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen3.7 Plus live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4 is deprecated and can no longer be run. Details and evals are still available on its model page.

QwenQwen3.7 Plus
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen3.7 Plus Comparison Table

Evals updated October 8, 2026Pricing updated October 8, 2026

PropertyClaude Opus 4Qwen3.7 Plus
OrganizationAnthropicQwen
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodal—
Release DateMay 2025Jun 2026
Context Window200K—
ParametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseProprietaryUnknown
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1MNo published price$0.320
Output $/1MNo published price$1.28
Vision Tasks
CaptioningSupportedDemo
ClassificationSupportedDemo
Object DetectionSupportedDemo
OCRSupportedDemo
Visual Question AnsweringSupportedDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedNot listed
Document Question AnsweringSupportedNot listed
Image TaggingSupportedNot listed
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedNot listed
Vision LanguageSupportedNot listed
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedNot listed
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedNot listed
Multimodal VisionSupportedNot listed
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
OverallDeprecated
58.9%
Avg cost / sample–$0.0008
Avg speed / sample–7.77s
By task
Object Detection–
60.1%
$0.0013
Counting–
50.0%
$0.0004
Identification–
84.4%
$0.0003
OCR (low)–
60.3%
$0.0009
by category
Single value
53.5%
Transcription
86.7%
Structured JSON
75.8%
Text localization
23.1%
OCR (high)–
65.5%
$0.0042
by category
Single value
58.3%
Transcription
89.7%
Structured JSON
81.3%
Text localization
30.4%
Reasoning (low)–
39.7%
$0.0003
Reasoning (high)–
68.2%
$0.0043

Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen3.7 Plus: Overview

Claude Opus 4

Claude 4 Opus, released by Anthropic in May 2025, is the flagship model of the Claude 4 family, built for complex, long-horizon reasoning and advanced coding workflows. It is multimodal, supporting text (including voice), images, and tool use, and operates as a hybrid reasoning model—able to deliver quick answers in fast mode or switch to extended thinking for deeper, multi-step problem solving. With a ~200,000-token context window and a training cutoff around March 2025, it is optimized for handling large documents, long conversations, and sophisticated agentic tasks.

Positioned at the high end of Anthropic’s offerings, Opus 4 achieves state-of-the-art results on coding benchmarks like SWE-Bench (72.5%) and Terminal-Bench (43.2%). It is best suited for research, enterprise automation, and software development at scale. The model is classified at Anthropic’s ASL-3 safety level, denoting advanced oversight and safety features.

Qwen3.7 Plus
No description available

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Opus 4 has been deprecated by its provider and can no longer be run, so it is not part of Roboflow's current Vision Evals. This page compares the models on specs, licensing, and pricing instead.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.