Roboflow

Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen

Gemini 4 Hydrogen: 87.3% average across five Vision Evals tasks (#3 of 69 models). Claude Opus 4 is deprecated and was not run through Roboflow's Vision Evals, so there is no head-to-head score.

Anthropic

Compare Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4 is deprecated and can no longer be run. Details and evals are still available on its model page.

GoogleGemini 4 Hydrogen
Run to compare this model.

Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen Comparison Table

Evals updated November 12, 2026

PropertyClaude Opus 4Gemini 4 Hydrogen
OrganizationAnthropicGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMay 2025Nov 2026
Context Window200K1.0M
ParametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Vision Tasks
CaptioningSupportedDemo
ClassificationSupportedDemo
Object DetectionSupportedDemo
OCRSupportedDemo
Visual Question AnsweringSupportedDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedNot listed
Document Question AnsweringSupportedNot listed
Image TaggingSupportedNot listed
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedNot listed
Promptable Concept SegmentationNot listedDemo
Both support 1 more task
Model Features
Both support 3 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
OverallDeprecated
87.3%
Avg cost / sample–$0.0094
Avg speed / sample–13.23s
By task
Object Detection (low)–
81.0%
±0.8, Mean of 3 runs, range 80.3 to 81.9
$0.016
Object Detection (high)–
83.3%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.4 to 83.8
$0.022
Counting (low)–
83.8%
±2.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.4 to 86.5
$0.0041
Counting (high)–
84.2%
±2.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.4 to 87.8
$0.012
Identification (low)–
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
$0.0030
Identification (high)–
96.9%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 96.9 to 96.9
$0.0039
OCR (low)–
86.7%
$0.0089
by category
Single value
78.7%
Transcription
96.1%
Structured JSON
93.6%
Text localization
83.9%
OCR (high)–
87.2%
$0.026
by category
Single value
80.9%
Transcription
95.3%
Structured JSON
93.1%
Text localization
83.7%
Reasoning (low)–
88.1%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.4 to 88.7
$0.0046
Reasoning (high)–
91.8%
±0.3, Mean of 3 runs, range 91.4 to 92.0
$0.013

Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 4 Hydrogen: Overview

Claude Opus 4

Claude 4 Opus, released by Anthropic in May 2025, is the flagship model of the Claude 4 family, built for complex, long-horizon reasoning and advanced coding workflows. It is multimodal, supporting text (including voice), images, and tool use, and operates as a hybrid reasoning model—able to deliver quick answers in fast mode or switch to extended thinking for deeper, multi-step problem solving. With a ~200,000-token context window and a training cutoff around March 2025, it is optimized for handling large documents, long conversations, and sophisticated agentic tasks.

It is best suited for research, enterprise automation, and software development at scale. The model is classified at Anthropic’s ASL-3 safety level, denoting advanced oversight and safety features.

Gemini 4 Hydrogen

Gemini 4 Hydrogen is a multimodal model from Google, positioned as a successor to Gemini 3.8 Flash with stronger agent and coding capabilities at Flash-class speed.