Roboflow

Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Compare Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 5.5 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, Object Detection, Open Prompt, and Classification.

Compare Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4 is deprecated and can no longer be run. Details and evals are still available on its model page.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5.5
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 Comparison Table

Evals updated October 8, 2026Pricing updated October 11, 2026

PropertyClaude Opus 4Claude Sonnet 5.5
OrganizationAnthropicAnthropic
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMay 2025Sep 2026
Context Window200K1.0M
ParametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1MNo published price$2.00
Output $/1MNo published price$10.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningSupportedDemo
Chart Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
ClassificationSupportedDemo
Document Question AnsweringSupportedSupported
Image TaggingSupportedSupported
Multi-Label ClassificationSupportedSupported
Object DetectionSupportedDemo
OCRSupportedDemo
Vision LanguageSupportedSupported
Visual Question AnsweringSupportedDemo
Model Features
Foundation VisionSupportedSupported
LLMs with Vision CapabilitiesSupportedSupported
Multimodal VisionSupportedSupported
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
OverallDeprecated
77.6%
Avg cost / sample–$0.0073
Avg speed / sample–8.33s
By task
Object Detection (low)–
74.3%
±0.9, Mean of 3 runs, range 73.5 to 75.3
$0.0098
Object Detection (high)–
76.8%
±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 76.5 to 77.3
$0.014
Counting (low)–
79.3%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 79.7
$0.0042
Counting (high)–
82.9%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.1 to 83.8
$0.0053
Identification (low)–
91.7%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 93.8
$0.0029
Identification (high)–
90.6%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 90.6
$0.0033
OCR–
66.3%
$0.0075
by category
Single value
48.7%
Transcription
76.3%
Structured JSON
83.8%
Text localization
60.6%
Reasoning (low)–
76.4%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.5 to 76.8
$0.0049
Reasoning (high)–
83.9%
±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.1 to 85.4
$0.0061

Claude Opus 4 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: Overview

Claude Opus 4

Claude 4 Opus, released by Anthropic in May 2025, is the flagship model of the Claude 4 family, built for complex, long-horizon reasoning and advanced coding workflows. It is multimodal, supporting text (including voice), images, and tool use, and operates as a hybrid reasoning model—able to deliver quick answers in fast mode or switch to extended thinking for deeper, multi-step problem solving. With a ~200,000-token context window and a training cutoff around March 2025, it is optimized for handling large documents, long conversations, and sophisticated agentic tasks.

Positioned at the high end of Anthropic’s offerings, Opus 4 achieves state-of-the-art results on coding benchmarks like SWE-Bench (72.5%) and Terminal-Bench (43.2%). It is best suited for research, enterprise automation, and software development at scale. The model is classified at Anthropic’s ASL-3 safety level, denoting advanced oversight and safety features.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is a proprietary multimodal language model from Anthropic and the second release in the Claude 5.5 family, following Claude Opus 5.5. It accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text, operating with a 1M token context window and a maximum output of 128K tokens per request. The model uses adaptive thinking by default, allocating variable reasoning effort per request rather than exposing a manual extended thinking toggle, and its training data cutoff is June 2026. Anthropic positions it as a faster, lower cost complement to Opus 5.5 for well scoped everyday tasks, bug fixing, and producing documents, slides, and spreadsheets.

On visual and agentic evaluations reported at launch, Sonnet 5.5 scores 61.6% on Chartography, a chart recognition test, compared with 15.6% for Claude Sonnet 5, and 80.1% on OSWorld 2.1, a computer use benchmark measuring screenshot driven control of a desktop environment, compared with 57.0% for Sonnet 5. It reports 70.6% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 for agentic coding. Anthropic describes it as the first Sonnet model able to complete Pokemon Red from screenshots alone, and it generates output more than 30% faster than Sonnet 5 while using fewer tokens for equivalent work.

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude Opus 4 has been deprecated by its provider and can no longer be run, so it is not part of Roboflow's current Vision Evals. This page compares the models on specs, licensing, and pricing instead.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for image captioning and OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.