Roboflow

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google Vision OCR

Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 and Google Vision OCR side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR.

Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google Vision OCR live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGoogle Vision OCR
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google Vision OCR: Overview

Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s lightweight model in the Claude 4.5 series, released in October 2025 under a proprietary license. Designed for speed and cost efficiency, it delivers near-frontier performance while maintaining Anthropic’s AI Safety Level 2 standard. Haiku 4.5 supports both text and multimodal (text and image) inputs, integrates tool use and extended reasoning, and features a 200,000 token context window, making it adept at handling long or complex workflows. Though the parameter count remains undisclosed, it achieves about 73.3% on SWE-bench Verified, reflecting strong coding and reasoning ability. Haiku 4.5 is ideal for developers and researchers seeking rapid, cost-effective model calls for analysis, coding, or multimodal understanding.

Google Vision OCR

Google Vision OCR, released as part of the Cloud Vision API’s general availability in February 2016, is a proprietary Google Cloud service for extracting text from images and documents. It supports common formats like JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF, and PDF, and provides two main modes: TEXT_DETECTION for short snippets and scene text, and DOCUMENT_TEXT_DETECTION for dense documents, which returns structured layout information with bounding boxes.

While not an LLM (so it has no token context window or parameter count), the service performs OCR across printed text and some handwriting. It outputs detected text along with positional metadata, making it useful for digitizing scanned files, receipts, forms, and signs. However, complex layouts like tables often require downstream processing. Accessible via REST and RPC APIs, with client libraries in major languages, Google Vision OCR is widely used for document processing pipelines, archival, and accessibility applications.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Google Vision OCR Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Haiku 4.5Google Vision OCR
OrganizationAnthropicGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalvision
Release DateOct 2025Feb 2016
Context Window200K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.00
Output $/1M$5.00
Vision Tasks
OCRDemoDemo
CaptioningDemo
ClassificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
58.21%
Avg Response Time3.15s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.2K
Median output tokens174
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0030
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
0%(0/10)
Object Understanding
71.4%(10/14)
Spatial Understanding
52.6%(10/19)
OCR
Overall Score
61.57%
Avg Response Time2.13s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens735
Median output tokens101
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0012
Focused Scene OCR
61.6%(61/99)
Handwritten Math
20%(2/10)
License Plate Recognition
66.7%(20/30)
Text Recognition
63.3%(19/30)
VQA & Extraction
65%(39/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology