Roboflow

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4

Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Opus 4 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, OCR, Classification, and Object Detection.

Compare Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5
Run to compare this model.
AnthropicClaude Opus 4

Claude Opus 4 is deprecated and can no longer be run. Details and evals are still available on its model page.

Models in this comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4: Overview

Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s lightweight model in the Claude 4.5 series, released in October 2025 under a proprietary license. Designed for speed and cost efficiency, it delivers near-frontier performance while maintaining Anthropic’s AI Safety Level 2 standard. Haiku 4.5 supports both text and multimodal (text and image) inputs, integrates tool use and extended reasoning, and features a 200,000 token context window, making it adept at handling long or complex workflows. Though the parameter count remains undisclosed, it achieves about 73.3% on SWE-bench Verified, reflecting strong coding and reasoning ability. Haiku 4.5 is ideal for developers and researchers seeking rapid, cost-effective model calls for analysis, coding, or multimodal understanding.

Claude Opus 4

Claude 4 Opus, released by Anthropic in May 2025, is the flagship model of the Claude 4 family, built for complex, long-horizon reasoning and advanced coding workflows. It is multimodal, supporting text (including voice), images, and tool use, and operates as a hybrid reasoning model—able to deliver quick answers in fast mode or switch to extended thinking for deeper, multi-step problem solving. With a ~200,000-token context window and a training cutoff around March 2025, it is optimized for handling large documents, long conversations, and sophisticated agentic tasks.

Positioned at the high end of Anthropic’s offerings, Opus 4 achieves state-of-the-art results on coding benchmarks like SWE-Bench (72.5%) and Terminal-Bench (43.2%). It is best suited for research, enterprise automation, and software development at scale. The model is classified at Anthropic’s ASL-3 safety level, denoting advanced oversight and safety features.

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4 Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 4
OrganizationAnthropicAnthropic
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateOct 2025May 2025
Context Window200K200K
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.00$15.00
Output $/1M$5.00$75.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemo
ClassificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
58.21%
56.72%
Avg Response Time3.15s19.74s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.2K
Median output tokens174
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0030
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
66.7%(10/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
0%(0/10)
0%(0/10)
Object Understanding
71.4%(10/14)
64.3%(9/14)
Spatial Understanding
52.6%(10/19)
57.9%(11/19)
OCR
Overall Score
61.57%
Avg Response Time2.13s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens735
Median output tokens101
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0012
Focused Scene OCR
61.6%(61/99)
Handwritten Math
20%(2/10)
License Plate Recognition
66.7%(20/30)
Text Recognition
63.3%(19/30)
VQA & Extraction
65%(39/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology