Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen VL Max
Compare Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen VL Max side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, OCR, and Image Captioning.
Compare Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen VL Max live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.
Upload an image
Drag and drop an image here, or click to browse
Models in this comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen VL Max: Overview
Claude 4.1 Opus, released by Anthropic in August 2025, is the upgraded flagship of the Claude 4 family, building on Opus 4 with stronger reasoning and agentic capabilities. Like its predecessor, it is multimodal and optimized for text, code, and tool use, with support for large context windows suited to multi-file codebases, technical workflows, and long-horizon problem solving.
On benchmarks, Opus 4.1 improves coding performance, reaching ~74.5% on SWE-Bench Verified compared to Opus 4’s ~72.5%. It demonstrates more precise debugging, refactoring, and orchestration of agentic tasks while maintaining similar safety and alignment safeguards. It is best suited for enterprise-scale software development, research automation, and advanced reasoning workflows where reliability and depth of analysis are critical.
Qwen-VL-Max is a proprietary vision-language model developed by Alibaba’s QwenLM team. Released on February 1, 2025, it is the flagship offering in the Qwen-VL family and sits above the VL-Plus tier in capability.
The model supports text and image inputs and provides a context window of up to 131,072 tokens (with a maximum input size of 129,024 tokens), according to Alibaba Cloud Model Studio. While the parameter count for VL-Max has not been publicly disclosed, the broader Qwen2.5-VL series includes open-weight models scaling up to 72B parameters.
Qwen-VL-Max is optimized for advanced multimodal applications such as document parsing, visual reasoning, multilingual analysis, and structured data extraction. Unlike the open Qwen2.5-VL variants, VL-Max is not available as open weights.
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen VL Max Comparison Table
| Property | Claude Opus 4.1 | Qwen VL Max |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Anthropic | Qwen |
| Category | closed | closed |
| Modality | multimodal | multimodal |
| Release Date | Aug 2025 | Feb 2025 |
| Context Window | 200K | 131K |
| Parameters | ||
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $15.00 | |
| Output $/1M | $75.00 | |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| Captioning | Demo | Demo |
| Object Detection | Demo | |
| OCR | Demo | Demo |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | Demo |
| Classification | Demo | |
| Model Features | ||
| LLMs with Vision Capabilities | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
| Foundation Vision | ||
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts Score key:≥75%40–74%<40% | ||
| Overall Score | 59.7% | |
| Avg Response Time | 7.09s | |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 2.0K | |
| Median output tokens | 140 | |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | $0.040 | |
| Defect Detection | 73.3%(11/15) | |
| Document Understanding | 88.9%(8/9) | |
| Object Counting | 0%(0/10) | |
| Object Understanding | 64.3%(9/14) | |
| Spatial Understanding | 63.2%(12/19) | |
Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology