Roboflow

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Sonnet 5.5

Claude Sonnet 5.5: 77.6% average across five Vision Evals tasks (#11 of 65 models). Claude 3.7 Sonnet is deprecated and was not run through Roboflow's Vision Evals, so there is no head-to-head score.

Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude 3.7 Sonnet

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is deprecated and can no longer be run. Details and evals are still available on its model page.

AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5.5
Run to compare this model.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 Comparison Table

Evals updated October 26, 2026Pricing updated November 1, 2026

PropertyClaude 3.7 SonnetClaude Sonnet 5.5
OrganizationAnthropicAnthropic
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2024Sep 2026
Context Window200K1.0M
ParametersUnknownUnknown
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Commercial usecommercial use per vendor termscommercial use per vendor terms
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1MNo published price$2.00
Output $/1MNo published price$10.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningSupportedDemo
ClassificationSupportedDemo
Object DetectionSupportedDemo
OCRSupportedDemo
Visual Question AnsweringSupportedDemo
Both support 5 more tasks
Model Features
Both support 3 more features
Vision Evalsground-truth scores across 5 vision tasks, pooled at low effort
OverallDeprecated
77.6%
Avg cost / sample–$0.0073
Avg speed / sample–8.33s
By task
Object Detection (low)–
74.3%
±0.9, Mean of 3 runs, range 73.5 to 75.3
$0.0098
Object Detection (high)–
76.8%
±0.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 76.5 to 77.3
$0.014
Counting (low)–
79.3%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 78.4 to 79.7
$0.0042
Counting (high)–
82.9%
±1.4, Mean of 3 runs, range 81.1 to 83.8
$0.0053
Identification (low)–
91.7%
±3.1, Mean of 3 runs, range 87.5 to 93.8
$0.0029
Identification (high)–
90.6%
±0.0, Mean of 3 runs, range 90.6 to 90.6
$0.0033
OCR–
66.3%
$0.0075
by category
Single value
48.7%
Transcription
76.3%
Structured JSON
83.8%
Text localization
60.6%
Reasoning (low)–
76.4%
±0.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 75.5 to 76.8
$0.0049
Reasoning (high)–
83.9%
±1.7, Mean of 3 runs, range 82.1 to 85.4
$0.0061

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Claude Sonnet 5.5: Overview

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Claude 3.7 Sonnet, released by Anthropic in February 2025, is the company’s first hybrid reasoning model, combining fast response generation with an optional “extended thinking mode” that reveals longer, step-by-step reasoning. Like its predecessors, it is multimodal, handling both text and images, but expands its usability with up to 200,000 input tokens and up to 128,000 output tokens (64K generally available, 128K in beta). This makes it well-suited for analyzing large documents, codebases, or multi-turn conversations.

Typical applications include software development, research workflows, extended reasoning tasks, and enterprise-scale knowledge work where a trade-off between speed and visible reasoning is valuable.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is a proprietary multimodal language model from Anthropic and the second release in the Claude 5.5 family, following Claude Opus 5.5. It accepts interleaved text and image input and returns text, operating with a 1M token context window and a maximum output of 128K tokens per request. The model uses adaptive thinking by default, allocating variable reasoning effort per request rather than exposing a manual extended thinking toggle, and its training data cutoff is June 2026. Anthropic positions it as a faster, lower cost complement to Opus 5.5 for well scoped everyday tasks, bug fixing, and producing documents, slides, and spreadsheets.

Anthropic describes it as the first Sonnet model able to complete Pokemon Red from screenshots alone, and it generates output more than 30% faster than Sonnet 5 while using fewer tokens for equivalent work.