Roboflow

YOLO26 vs YOLOv10

YOLO26 scores 39.9–56.3 COCO mAP 50:95 across 5 sizes. YOLOv10 scores 38.0–53.6 across 5. Both are open-weight under AGPL 3.0, so commercial use needs a license (included on Roboflow cloud).

Compare YOLO26 vs YOLOv10 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Run a pretrained Object Detection (COCO) model and compare detections on the same image.

Open Object Detection (COCO) in the full playground
YOLO26
Run to compare this model.
THU-MIGYOLOv10
Run to compare this model.

YOLO26 vs YOLOv10 on COCO

At similar sizes, YOLO26 Large (24.8M params) scores 53.6 and YOLOv10 Large (25.8M) scores 52.3.

YOLO26YOLOv10

COCO val2017 mAP 50:95 against parameter count, one point per size · from leaderboard.roboflow.com

YOLO26 vs YOLOv10 Comparison Table

PropertyYOLO26YOLOv10
OrganizationUltralyticsTHU-MIG
Categoryopenopen
Modalityvisionvision
Release DateOct 2025May 2024
Context Window——
Parameters2.4M-55.7M2.3M-29.5M
LicenseAGPL 3.0AGPL 3.0
Commercial usecommercial use needs a license (included on Roboflow cloud)commercial use needs a license (included on Roboflow cloud)
COCO Benchmark object detection, mAP 50:95 on COCO val2017
Best size56.3Extra Large · 55.7M params53.6XL · 31.7M params
Smallest size39.9Nano · 2.4M params38.0Nano · 2.8M params
mAP range39.9–56.3across 5 sizes38.0–53.6across 5 sizes
Model Sizes COCO mAP 50:95, tested resolution and params per size
Nano39.9640×640 · 2.4M params38.0640×640 · 2.8M params
Small47.2640×640 · 9.5M params45.7640×640 · 8.1M params
Medium52.0640×640 · 20.4M params50.3640×640 · 16.5M params
Large53.6640×640 · 24.8M params52.3640×640 · 25.8M params
XL56.3640×640 · 55.7M params53.6640×640 · 31.7M params
COCO val2017 mAP 50:95 and parameter counts from leaderboard.roboflow.com. Size names don't line up across model families, so compare sizes with similar parameter counts.
Vision Tasks
Instance SegmentationDemo (COCO)Not listed
Both support 1 more task

YOLO26 vs YOLOv10: Overview

YOLO26

YOLO26 is a real-time object detection model developed by Ultralytics, released in October 2025. It introduces a native end-to-end, NMS-free architecture that eliminates the Non-Maximum Suppression post-processing step, reducing CPU latency by up to 43% for the Nano variant compared to NMS-dependent versions. The model incorporates the MuSGD optimizer and ProgLoss with STAL for improved training stability and small-object detection, and removes Distribution Focal Loss to ensure maximum compatibility with ONNX and TensorRT export targets.

YOLO26 supports object detection, instance segmentation, pose estimation, and oriented bounding box detection within a unified framework, with model sizes available from Nano to Extra Large. Its NMS-free design makes it particularly well suited for deployment scenarios where post-processing overhead is a bottleneck, such as embedded systems and real-time edge inference pipelines.

YOLOv10

YOLOv10 is a real-time end-to-end object detection model developed by THU-MIG at Tsinghua University, released in May 2024 under the AGPL-3.0 license. It introduces consistent dual assignments during training — using both one-to-many and one-to-one label assignment strategies — to eliminate the need for non-maximum suppression at inference time while maintaining competitive accuracy. This end-to-end design reduces inference latency compared to NMS-dependent detectors at similar accuracy levels.

YOLOv10-B achieves 52.7% AP on COCO with 46% lower latency than YOLOv9-C at comparable performance. The model is available in six sizes from Nano to Extra Large, built on the Ultralytics framework, and exportable to ONNX, TensorRT, and CoreML. YOLOv10 is suited for latency-sensitive deployment scenarios where post-processing overhead is a constraint.