Roboflow

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Google Vision OCR

Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B and Google Vision OCR side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR.

Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Google Vision OCR live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGoogle Vision OCR
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Google Vision OCR Comparison Table

Evals updated August 14, 2026Pricing updated August 14, 2026

PropertyGemma 4 26B A4BGoogle Vision OCR
OrganizationGoogleGoogle
Categoryopenclosed
Modalitymultimodalvision
Release DateApr 2026Feb 2016
Context Window256K
Parameters25.2B
LicenseApache 2.0Proprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.120
Output $/1M$0.400
Vision Tasks
OCRDemoDemo
CaptioningDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Object DetectionDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Google Vision OCR: Overview

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B is the Mixture-of-Experts variant in Google's Gemma 4 family, with 25.2B total parameters but only 3.8B active per token. Built from the same Gemini 3 research as the 31B dense sibling and released as open weights under the Apache 2.0 license, it supports a 256K token context window with text and image input and configurable thinking mode. The "A4B" in the name refers to its approximately 4B active parameters. The MoE design makes it significantly faster at inference than the dense 31B, running nearly as fast as a 4B-parameter model while delivering roughly 97% of the dense model's quality.

For vision tasks, the 26B A4B shares the same multimodal capabilities as the 31B image understanding with variable aspect ratios and resolutions, and structured bounding box output for UI element detection. The tradeoff versus the 31B dense model is a small quality reduction in exchange for much faster inference and lower hardware requirements, fitting in 18GB of VRAM at 4-bit quantization. It ranked #6 among open models on the Arena AI text leaderboard at launch.

Google Vision OCR

Google Vision OCR, released as part of the Cloud Vision API’s general availability in February 2016, is a proprietary Google Cloud service for extracting text from images and documents. It supports common formats like JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF, and PDF, and provides two main modes: TEXT_DETECTION for short snippets and scene text, and DOCUMENT_TEXT_DETECTION for dense documents, which returns structured layout information with bounding boxes.

While not an LLM (so it has no token context window or parameter count), the service performs OCR across printed text and some handwriting. It outputs detected text along with positional metadata, making it useful for digitizing scanned files, receipts, forms, and signs. However, complex layouts like tables often require downstream processing. Accessible via REST and RPC APIs, with client libraries in major languages, Google Vision OCR is widely used for document processing pipelines, archival, and accessibility applications.

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemma 4 26B A4B is released under Apache 2.0, while Google Vision OCR uses Proprietary. Licensing often matters more than raw accuracy for commercial deployments, so check the terms against how you plan to ship.

Yes. The comparison demo on this page runs both models on the same image side by side for OCR in the free Roboflow Playground. You can try it instantly, and a free account unlocks unlimited runs.