Roboflow

docTR vs Gemma 3 4B

Compare docTR and Gemma 3 4B side-by-side.

Compare docTR vs Gemma 3 4B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.

Models in this comparison

docTR vs Gemma 3 4B: Overview

docTR

docTR (Document Text Recognition) is an open-source OCR toolkit developed by Mindee, with its initial public release in March 2021 under the Apache 2.0 license. It provides end-to-end document text recognition through a two-stage pipeline consisting of text detection and text recognition, both implemented as deep learning models. docTR supports multiple detection architectures including DBNet and LinkNet, and recognition architectures including CRNN and SAR, with both TensorFlow and PyTorch backends available.

docTR is designed for reading text in document images including scanned PDFs, photographs of printed documents, and forms. It handles multilingual text recognition across standard Latin-script languages and is deployable through Roboflow Inference. It is suited for document digitization pipelines, automated form processing, and applications requiring accurate structured text extraction from document images.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma 3 4B, released on March 12, 2025, is the mid-sized member of Google DeepMind’s open-weight Gemma 3 family. With about 4 billion parameters, it is multimodal—supporting text and image inputs and generating text outputs. Like the larger Gemma 3 models, it features a 128,000-token input context window with an output capacity of ~8,192 tokens, enabling it to handle long documents and mixed text–image reasoning tasks.

The 4B variant is designed as a balance between efficiency and capability: it offers multilingual support across 140+ languages, strong summarization and reasoning performance, and compatibility with moderate hardware. Inference can run with ~6.4 GB VRAM in BF16, or significantly less in quantized 8-bit (~4.4 GB) or 4-bit (~3.4 GB) modes, making it accessible to developers outside large-scale infrastructure. While it lags behind the 12B and 27B versions on the most complex reasoning and multimodal benchmarks, its lower compute footprint makes it ideal for research, prototyping, and practical deployment where efficiency matters.

docTR vs Gemma 3 4B Comparison Table

PropertydocTRGemma 3 4B
OrganizationMindeeGoogle
Categoryopenopen
Modalityvisionmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2021Mar 2025
Context Window128K
Parameters4B
LicenseApache 2.0Proprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.050
Output $/1M$0.100
Vision Tasks
OCRDemo
CaptioningDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
37.31%
Avg Response Time16.80s
Defect Detection
60%(9/15)
Document Understanding
55.6%(5/9)
Object Counting
0%(0/10)
Object Understanding
42.9%(6/14)
Spatial Understanding
26.3%(5/19)
OCR
Overall Score
64.19%
Avg Response Time0.92s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens300
Median output tokens12
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark<$0.0001
Focused Scene OCR
63.6%(63/99)
Handwritten Math
10%(1/10)
License Plate Recognition
86.7%(26/30)
Text Recognition
73.3%(22/30)
VQA & Extraction
58.3%(35/60)