docTR vs Gemma 3 4B
Compare docTR and Gemma 3 4B side-by-side.
Compare docTR vs Gemma 3 4B live
Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.
These models don't share enough common tasks for a side-by-side demo. See the comparison table below for their capabilities.
Models in this comparison
docTR vs Gemma 3 4B: Overview
docTR (Document Text Recognition) is an open-source OCR toolkit developed by Mindee, with its initial public release in March 2021 under the Apache 2.0 license. It provides end-to-end document text recognition through a two-stage pipeline consisting of text detection and text recognition, both implemented as deep learning models. docTR supports multiple detection architectures including DBNet and LinkNet, and recognition architectures including CRNN and SAR, with both TensorFlow and PyTorch backends available.
docTR is designed for reading text in document images including scanned PDFs, photographs of printed documents, and forms. It handles multilingual text recognition across standard Latin-script languages and is deployable through Roboflow Inference. It is suited for document digitization pipelines, automated form processing, and applications requiring accurate structured text extraction from document images.
Gemma 3 4B, released on March 12, 2025, is the mid-sized member of Google DeepMind’s open-weight Gemma 3 family. With about 4 billion parameters, it is multimodal—supporting text and image inputs and generating text outputs. Like the larger Gemma 3 models, it features a 128,000-token input context window with an output capacity of ~8,192 tokens, enabling it to handle long documents and mixed text–image reasoning tasks.
The 4B variant is designed as a balance between efficiency and capability: it offers multilingual support across 140+ languages, strong summarization and reasoning performance, and compatibility with moderate hardware. Inference can run with ~6.4 GB VRAM in BF16, or significantly less in quantized 8-bit (~4.4 GB) or 4-bit (~3.4 GB) modes, making it accessible to developers outside large-scale infrastructure. While it lags behind the 12B and 27B versions on the most complex reasoning and multimodal benchmarks, its lower compute footprint makes it ideal for research, prototyping, and practical deployment where efficiency matters.
docTR vs Gemma 3 4B Comparison Table
| Property | docTR | Gemma 3 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Organization | Mindee | |
| Category | open | open |
| Modality | vision | multimodal |
| Release Date | Feb 2021 | Mar 2025 |
| Context Window | — | 128K |
| Parameters | 4B | |
| License | Apache 2.0 | Proprietary |
| Pricing per 1M tokens | ||
| Input $/1M | $0.050 | |
| Output $/1M | $0.100 | |
| Vision Tasks | ||
| OCR | Demo | |
| Captioning | Demo | |
| Vision Language | ||
| Visual Question Answering | Demo | |
| Model Features | ||
| Multimodal Vision | ||
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts Score key:≥75%40–74%<40% | ||
| Visual Understanding | ||
| Overall Score | 37.31% | |
| Avg Response Time | 16.80s | |
| Defect Detection | 60%(9/15) | |
| Document Understanding | 55.6%(5/9) | |
| Object Counting | 0%(0/10) | |
| Object Understanding | 42.9%(6/14) | |
| Spatial Understanding | 26.3%(5/19) | |
| OCR | ||
| Overall Score | 64.19% | |
| Avg Response Time | 0.92s | |
| Median input tokensincl. image tokens | 300 | |
| Median output tokens | 12 | |
| Est. cost / taskon this benchmark | <$0.0001 | |
| Focused Scene OCR | 63.6%(63/99) | |
| Handwritten Math | 10%(1/10) | |
| License Plate Recognition | 86.7%(26/30) | |
| Text Recognition | 73.3%(22/30) | |
| VQA & Extraction | 58.3%(35/60) | |