Gemma 3 4B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

Compare Gemma 3 4B and Gemma 4 26B A4B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare Gemma 3 4B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemma 3 4B
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemma 4 26B A4B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B: Overview

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma 3 4B, released on March 12, 2025, is the mid-sized member of Google DeepMind’s open-weight Gemma 3 family. With about 4 billion parameters, it is multimodal—supporting text and image inputs and generating text outputs. Like the larger Gemma 3 models, it features a 128,000-token input context window with an output capacity of ~8,192 tokens, enabling it to handle long documents and mixed text–image reasoning tasks.

The 4B variant is designed as a balance between efficiency and capability: it offers multilingual support across 140+ languages, strong summarization and reasoning performance, and compatibility with moderate hardware. Inference can run with ~6.4 GB VRAM in BF16, or significantly less in quantized 8-bit (~4.4 GB) or 4-bit (~3.4 GB) modes, making it accessible to developers outside large-scale infrastructure. While it lags behind the 12B and 27B versions on the most complex reasoning and multimodal benchmarks, its lower compute footprint makes it ideal for research, prototyping, and practical deployment where efficiency matters.

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B is the Mixture-of-Experts variant in Google's Gemma 4 family, with 25.2B total parameters but only 3.8B active per token. Built from the same Gemini 3 research as the 31B dense sibling and released as open weights under the Apache 2.0 license, it supports a 256K token context window with text and image input and configurable thinking mode. The "A4B" in the name refers to its approximately 4B active parameters. The MoE design makes it significantly faster at inference than the dense 31B, running nearly as fast as a 4B-parameter model while delivering roughly 97% of the dense model's quality.

For vision tasks, the 26B A4B shares the same multimodal capabilities as the 31B image understanding with variable aspect ratios and resolutions, and structured bounding box output for UI element detection. The tradeoff versus the 31B dense model is a small quality reduction in exchange for much faster inference and lower hardware requirements, fitting in 18GB of VRAM at 4-bit quantization. It ranked #6 among open models on the Arena AI text leaderboard at launch.

Gemma 3 4B vs Gemma 4 26B A4B Comparison Table

PropertyGemma 3 4BGemma 4 26B A4B
OrganizationGoogleGoogle
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2025Apr 2026
Context Window128K256K
Parameters4B25.2B
LicenseProprietaryApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.050$0.060
Output $/1M$0.100$0.330
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
classificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
37.31%
68.66%
Avg Response Time16.80s30.23s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens294
Median output tokens214
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0001
Defect Detection
60%(9/15)
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
55.6%(5/9)
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
0%(0/10)
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
42.9%(6/14)
85.7%(12/14)
Spatial Understanding
26.3%(5/19)
68.4%(13/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology