Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Gemma 3 4B

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro and Gemma 3 4B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, and OCR.

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Gemma 3 4B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
GoogleGemini 3.1 Pro
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemma 3 4B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Gemma 3 4B: Overview

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro is a proprietary multimodal model from Google’s Gemini 3 series, released in early 2026 and designed for advanced reasoning across large multimodal datasets. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and documents, supporting up to a 1-million-token input context with up to 64k output tokens. Compared with Gemini 3 Pro, it improves long-context synthesis and multi-step reasoning, enabling more reliable analysis of large documents, datasets, and software codebases.

The model also advances visual understanding and grounding, allowing it to interpret UI screenshots, diagrams, and real-world scenes while referencing specific regions within images or video. These capabilities make Gemini 3.1 Pro well suited for multimodal workflows involving document processing, interface analysis, robotics research, and complex visual reasoning.

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma 3 4B, released on March 12, 2025, is the mid-sized member of Google DeepMind’s open-weight Gemma 3 family. With about 4 billion parameters, it is multimodal—supporting text and image inputs and generating text outputs. Like the larger Gemma 3 models, it features a 128,000-token input context window with an output capacity of ~8,192 tokens, enabling it to handle long documents and mixed text–image reasoning tasks.

The 4B variant is designed as a balance between efficiency and capability: it offers multilingual support across 140+ languages, strong summarization and reasoning performance, and compatibility with moderate hardware. Inference can run with ~6.4 GB VRAM in BF16, or significantly less in quantized 8-bit (~4.4 GB) or 4-bit (~3.4 GB) modes, making it accessible to developers outside large-scale infrastructure. While it lags behind the 12B and 27B versions on the most complex reasoning and multimodal benchmarks, its lower compute footprint makes it ideal for research, prototyping, and practical deployment where efficiency matters.

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs Gemma 3 4B Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 3.1 ProGemma 3 4B
OrganizationGoogleGoogle
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2026Mar 2025
Context Window1.0M128K
Parameters4B
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.00$0.050
Output $/1M$12.00$0.100
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 66 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
75.76%
37.31%
Avg Response Time6.13s16.80s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens11
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0024
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
60%(9/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
55.6%(5/9)
Object Counting
44.4%(4/9)
0%(0/10)
Object Understanding
92.9%(13/14)
42.9%(6/14)
Spatial Understanding
73.7%(14/19)
26.3%(5/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology