Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Llama 4 Maverick side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, Open Prompt, and OCR.

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Llama 4 Maverick live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6
Run to compare this model.
MetaLlama 4 Maverick
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Llama 4 Maverick: Overview

Claude Sonnet 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is Anthropic's mid-tier large language model, released February 17, 2026, designed to balance performance, cost, and versatility for professional and developer use. It supports text and vision-based tasks with advanced reasoning, agentic capabilities, and Adaptive Thinking — a mode where the model dynamically scales its internal reasoning depth. A beta context window of up to 1,000,000 tokens (200K standard) enables processing of entire codebases or document collections in a single request. Parameters are undisclosed.

Optimized for coding, computer use, long-context reasoning, agent planning, and knowledge work, Sonnet 4.6 delivers a full generational upgrade over Sonnet 4.5 and approaches Opus 4.5-level performance across many benchmarks at a fraction of the cost. It is the default model on Claude.ai, Claude Cowork, and is available via API and major cloud platforms — making it well suited for production workloads requiring strong reasoning without flagship pricing.

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick, introduced on April 5, 2025, is one of the first models in Meta’s Llama 4 family, designed as a natively multimodal model supporting text + image inputs with text outputs. It employs a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts, activating ~17B parameters per token out of a pool of ~400B total parameters. This design improves scalability, efficiency, and reasoning capacity. Maverick has a 1M-token context window, enabling it to handle large documents, extended conversations, and multimodal reasoning. Its knowledge cutoff is August 2024.

The model is released under the Llama 4 Community License and comes in both base and instruction-tuned (“Instruct”) versions. Maverick is widely deployed via Hugging Face, Google Vertex AI, Amazon Bedrock, and Oracle Cloud, making it one of the most accessible large open-weight models. However, it outputs text only (no image/audio generation) and, while input capacity is huge, output limits are typically much smaller. The MoE design also raises hardware demands, as maintaining 128 experts requires significant compute resources, and Meta’s license introduces restrictions around commercial-scale use.

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Llama 4 Maverick Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Sonnet 4.6Llama 4 Maverick
OrganizationAnthropicMeta
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2026Apr 2025
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters400B
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$3.00$0.150
Output $/1M$15.00$0.600
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
70.15%
Avg Response Time4.24s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.2K
Median output tokens105
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0080
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
30%(3/10)
Object Understanding
71.4%(10/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
OCR
Overall Score
81.66%
Avg Response Time3.42s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens736
Median output tokens85
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0035
Focused Scene OCR
85.9%(85/99)
Handwritten Math
50%(5/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
86.7%(26/30)
VQA & Extraction
73.3%(44/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology