Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Compare Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 2.5 Pro side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, OCR, Object Detection, Classification, and Image Captioning.

Compare Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: Overview

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is the flagship large language model from Anthropic, released on 2026-02-05 for advanced reasoning, complex coding, and enterprise agent workflows. It supports text and image inputs via API, offers a 200K-token standard context window with a 1M-token beta option, and enables outputs up to 128K tokens, with adaptive reasoning and context compaction for sustained tasks.

As of 2026-02-17, Anthropic also released Claude Sonnet 4.6, extending the 1M-token context window to a broader tier. Opus remains positioned for maximum depth and benchmark performance, while Sonnet 4.6 brings long-context capability to more cost- and latency-sensitive production use cases.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro, released on June 17, 2025, is Google DeepMind’s most capable model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for deep reasoning, coding, and complex multimodal tasks. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and PDFs as input and outputs text. The model supports 1 million input tokens with an output capacity of up to 65K tokens, enabling large-scale comprehension of datasets, codebases, and technical documents. Its training knowledge extends to January 2025.

Pro outperforms earlier Gemini 2.0 models across benchmarks, including agentic coding tasks where it achieved ~63.8% on SWE-Bench Verified. It supports structured outputs, function calling, code execution, search grounding, and URL context, making it well-suited for enterprise, STEM, and developer workflows. However, it does not currently support image or audio generation in its stable release, and its higher computational cost and latency make it less efficient than Flash or Flash-Lite. It is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, and Vertex AI.

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Opus 4.6 Gemini 2.5 Pro
OrganizationAnthropicGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateFeb 2026Jun 2025
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$5.00$1.25
Output $/1M$25.00$10.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
64.18%
70.15%
Avg Response Time23.35s11.87s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.2K294
Median output tokens130565
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.014$0.0060
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
73.3%(11/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
20%(2/10)
Object Understanding
71.4%(10/14)
78.6%(11/14)
Spatial Understanding
68.4%(13/19)
78.9%(15/19)
OCR
Overall Score
82.53%
78.6%
Avg Response Time5.05s4.91s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens736290
Median output tokens99323
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0062$0.0036
Focused Scene OCR
85.9%(85/99)
78.8%(78/99)
Handwritten Math
70%(7/10)
80%(8/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
90%(27/30)
Text Recognition
80%(24/30)
73.3%(22/30)
VQA & Extraction
76.7%(46/60)
75%(45/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology