Kimi K2.5 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Compare Kimi K2.5 and Mistral Small 3.1 24B side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare Kimi K2.5 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
MoonshotAIKimi K2.5
Run to compare this model.
MistralMistral Small 3.1 24B
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2.5 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B: Overview

Kimi K2.5

Kimi K2.5 is a frontier-scale multimodal AI model developed by Moonshot AI and released on January 27, 2026. As a significant advancement within the Kimi K2 family, it utilizes a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 1 trillion total parameters (32 billion active per inference) and a massive 256K-token context window. The model features native multimodal integration via a 400M-parameter MoonViT encoder, allowing it to process text, images, and video frames simultaneously. Built for both speed and depth, it offers "Instant" and "Thinking" modes, the latter of which excels at expert-level reasoning, scoring 50.2% on the Humanity’s Last Exam (HLE) benchmark when equipped with tools.

The model is released under a Modified MIT License, which remains open-weight but requires attribution for high-revenue commercial entities. It introduces an "Agent Swarm" paradigm capable of coordinating up to 100 specialized sub-agents for parallel workflows, significantly reducing latency in complex research tasks. For vision tasks, Kimi K2.5 demonstrates strong autonomous visual debugging capabilities, where it can inspect its own generated UI outputs against visual specifications to iteratively refine frontend code. This makes it a powerful choice for developers testing automated UI reconstruction, high-fidelity OCR document processing, and multi-step agentic research grounded in complex visual data.

Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Mistral Small 3.1 24B, released on March 17, 2025, is an open-weight multimodal model from Mistral AI, distributed under the Apache-2.0 license. With around 24B parameters and a 128K token context window, it is available in both base and instruction-tuned (“Instruct”) variants. The model introduces vision support alongside text, enabling tasks like multimodal reasoning, captioning, and image-based Q&A.

It is multilingual, supporting many languages, and is optimized for fast responses, function calling, structured dialogue, and long-context reasoning. Despite its size, the model can be run locally in quantized formats, fitting on machines with ~32GB RAM, making it accessible to developers outside large cloud setups. However, the output length is smaller than the 128K input window, meaning long generations may require chaining. In addition, using full vision features or the maximum context window significantly increases compute costs, and performance on highly complex reasoning or enterprise-scale tasks still trails larger proprietary frontier models.

Kimi K2.5 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Comparison Table

PropertyKimi K2.5Mistral Small 3.1 24B
OrganizationMoonshot AIMistral
Categoryopenopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJan 2026Mar 2025
Context Window256K128K
Parameters1T24B
LicenseModified MITApache 2.0
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.375$0.351
Output $/1M$2.02$0.555
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
35.82%
Avg Response Time14.81s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.6K
Median output tokens766
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0021
Defect Detection
46.7%(7/15)
Document Understanding
55.6%(5/9)
Object Counting
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
42.9%(6/14)
Spatial Understanding
26.3%(5/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology