GPT-5.4 vs Kimi K2.5

Compare GPT-5.4 and Kimi K2.5 side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in OCR, Image Captioning, and Open Prompt.

Compare GPT-5.4 vs Kimi K2.5 live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-5.4
Run to compare this model.
MoonshotAIKimi K2.5
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

OpenAI
MoonshotAI

GPT-5.4 vs Kimi K2.5: Overview

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 is a proprietary multimodal large language model developed by OpenAI and released on March 5, 2026. It is designed for professional workloads such as advanced software development, research, and agentic automation. The model combines the general reasoning capabilities of the GPT-5 series with software engineering improvements derived from GPT-5.3-Codex. In the API and Codex environments it supports context windows of up to 1 million tokens, enabling long-context reasoning and large-scale code or document workflows.

Compared with GPT-5.2, GPT-5.4 reduces false individual claims by 33% and lowers overall response errors by 18%, improving factual reliability across complex tasks. It is also the first general-purpose OpenAI release with native computer-use capabilities, allowing agents to interact with desktops, browsers, and external applications to complete multi-step workflows. The model family includes three variants: GPT-5.4 (standard), GPT-5.4 Pro for higher-performance workloads, and GPT-5.4 Thinking, a reasoning-oriented version in ChatGPT that presents an upfront plan before generating its response. The API also introduces a Tool Search system that allows models to retrieve tool definitions dynamically, reducing token usage in tool-heavy integrations.

Kimi K2.5

Kimi K2.5 is a frontier-scale multimodal AI model developed by Moonshot AI and released on January 27, 2026. As a significant advancement within the Kimi K2 family, it utilizes a sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 1 trillion total parameters (32 billion active per inference) and a massive 256K-token context window. The model features native multimodal integration via a 400M-parameter MoonViT encoder, allowing it to process text, images, and video frames simultaneously. Built for both speed and depth, it offers "Instant" and "Thinking" modes, the latter of which excels at expert-level reasoning, scoring 50.2% on the Humanity’s Last Exam (HLE) benchmark when equipped with tools.

The model is released under a Modified MIT License, which remains open-weight but requires attribution for high-revenue commercial entities. It introduces an "Agent Swarm" paradigm capable of coordinating up to 100 specialized sub-agents for parallel workflows, significantly reducing latency in complex research tasks. For vision tasks, Kimi K2.5 demonstrates strong autonomous visual debugging capabilities, where it can inspect its own generated UI outputs against visual specifications to iteratively refine frontend code. This makes it a powerful choice for developers testing automated UI reconstruction, high-fidelity OCR document processing, and multi-step agentic research grounded in complex visual data.

GPT-5.4 vs Kimi K2.5 Comparison Table

PropertyGPT-5.4Kimi K2.5
OrganizationOpenAIMoonshot AI
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2026Jan 2026
Context Window1.1M256K
Parameters1T
LicenseProprietaryModified MIT
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$2.50$0.375
Output $/1M$15.00$2.02
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
77.61%
35.82%
Avg Response Time7.16s14.81s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.4K1.6K
Median output tokens108766
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0052$0.0021
Defect Detection
86.7%(13/15)
46.7%(7/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
55.6%(5/9)
Object Counting
40%(4/10)
10%(1/10)
Object Understanding
85.7%(12/14)
42.9%(6/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
26.3%(5/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology