GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.6 Flash

Compare GPT-5.4 Mini and Qwen3.6 Flash side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Open Prompt, Image Captioning, and OCR.

Compare GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.6 Flash live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
OpenAIGPT-5.4 Mini
Run to compare this model.
QwenQwen3.6 Flash
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.6 Flash: Overview

GPT-5.4 Mini

GPT-5.4 mini is a fast, cost-efficient model developed by OpenAI and released on March 17, 2026, optimized for high-throughput workloads and subagent orchestration. It supports text and image inputs within a 400,000-token context window, making it ideal for processing extensive visual datasets and large codebases in a single request. Designed for low-latency production environments, the model integrates with key API features including function calling, web search, and tool-based computer use, allowing it to assist in automated workflows that require navigating digital interfaces.

Compared to the previous GPT-5 mini, this version runs more than twice as fast while approaching the performance levels of the flagship GPT-5.4 on reasoning and coding benchmarks. While the larger GPT-5.4 introduces native, state-of-the-art computer-use capabilities, GPT-5.4 mini provides a scalable alternative for interpreting screenshots and reasoning over dense UI layouts. For vision tasks on Playground, it excels at extracting structured information from visual documents and assisting in agentic tasks that involve real-time interpretation of software interfaces alongside text.

Qwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3.6-Flash is the production API variant of the Qwen3.6 model series, developed by the Qwen team at Alibaba Group. It is built on the Qwen3.6-35B-A3B architecture, which combines a hybrid linear attention mechanism with sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) routing to achieve high-throughput inference with reduced latency. The model is natively multimodal, processing both text and images within a unified early-fusion architecture, and supports 201 languages and dialects. It operates in a hybrid thinking mode, capable of generating explicit chain-of-thought reasoning before producing a final response, with the option to disable thinking for direct output. A Thinking Preservation feature allows reasoning context to be retained across multi-turn conversations, which is particularly useful for iterative agentic workflows.

The model is trained with reinforcement learning scaled across large-scale agent environments and covers a broad range of tasks including agentic coding, frontend development, visual understanding, document processing, and tool use. Compared to the open-weight Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, the Flash API variant extends the default context window to 1 million tokens and includes built-in production features such as native function calling and official tool integrations. The underlying architecture achieves near-100% multimodal training efficiency relative to text-only training, and the model demonstrates strong performance on agentic coding benchmarks including SWE-bench Verified.

GPT-5.4 Mini vs Qwen3.6 Flash Comparison Table

PropertyGPT-5.4 MiniQwen3.6 Flash
OrganizationOpenAIQwen
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateMar 2026Apr 2026
Context Window400K1.0M
Parameters35B (3B active, MoE)
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.750$0.188
Output $/1M$4.50$1.13
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Chart Question Answering
ClassificationDemo
Document Question Answering
Object DetectionDemo
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
74.63%
Avg Response Time7.87s
Defect Detection
80%(12/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
30%(3/10)
Object Understanding
85.7%(12/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)