Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Maverick

Compare Claude Opus 4.7 and Llama 4 Maverick side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Image Captioning, OCR, and Open Prompt.

Compare Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Maverick live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Extract and compare text from images across multiple models.

Open OCR in the full playground
AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7
Run to compare this model.
MetaLlama 4 Maverick
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Maverick: Overview

Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 is a proprietary multimodal language model developed by Anthropic, released on April 16, 2026. It is designed for agentic coding, long-horizon task execution, and enterprise knowledge work. The model supports text and vision inputs and operates with a context window of up to 1,000,000 tokens. It introduces adaptive thinking, which dynamically allocates reasoning based on task complexity, along with configurable effort controls including a new xhigh setting that sits between the existing high and max levels. It achieves 87.6% on SWE-bench Verified and 78.0% on OSWorld-Verified, reflecting strong performance on autonomous software engineering and computer use tasks respectively.

Compared to Claude Opus 4.6, version 4.7 shows improved instruction following and higher reliability in extended agentic tasks. Vision capabilities now support high-resolution inputs up to 2,576px on the long edge (~3.75 megapixels), more than three times the resolution of prior Claude models, enabling finer interpretation of dense diagrams, UI screenshots, and document layouts. These improvements, combined with self-verification on long-running tasks and a new task budget system for controlling agentic loops, make it well-suited for complex software engineering, technical analysis, and multimodal vision workflows.

Llama 4 Maverick

Llama 4 Maverick, introduced on April 5, 2025, is one of the first models in Meta’s Llama 4 family, designed as a natively multimodal model supporting text + image inputs with text outputs. It employs a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architecture with 128 experts, activating ~17B parameters per token out of a pool of ~400B total parameters. This design improves scalability, efficiency, and reasoning capacity. Maverick has a 1M-token context window, enabling it to handle large documents, extended conversations, and multimodal reasoning. Its knowledge cutoff is August 2024.

The model is released under the Llama 4 Community License and comes in both base and instruction-tuned (“Instruct”) versions. Maverick is widely deployed via Hugging Face, Google Vertex AI, Amazon Bedrock, and Oracle Cloud, making it one of the most accessible large open-weight models. However, it outputs text only (no image/audio generation) and, while input capacity is huge, output limits are typically much smaller. The MoE design also raises hardware demands, as maintaining 128 experts requires significant compute resources, and Meta’s license introduces restrictions around commercial-scale use.

Claude Opus 4.7 vs Llama 4 Maverick Comparison Table

PropertyClaude Opus 4.7Llama 4 Maverick
OrganizationAnthropicMeta
Categoryclosedopen
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateApr 2026Apr 2025
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters400B
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$5.00$0.150
Output $/1M$25.00$0.600
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
ClassificationDemo
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
67.16%
Avg Response Time4.85s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2.4K
Median output tokens110
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.015
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
Document Understanding
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
Object Understanding
85.7%(12/14)
Spatial Understanding
68.4%(13/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology