Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro and Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite side-by-side. See how these vision models stack up in Object Detection, Open Prompt, Classification, OCR, and Image Captioning.

Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite: Overview

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro, released on June 17, 2025, is Google DeepMind’s most capable model in the Gemini 2.5 family, optimized for deep reasoning, coding, and complex multimodal tasks. It accepts text, images, audio, video, and PDFs as input and outputs text. The model supports 1 million input tokens with an output capacity of up to 65K tokens, enabling large-scale comprehension of datasets, codebases, and technical documents. Its training knowledge extends to January 2025.

Pro outperforms earlier Gemini 2.0 models across benchmarks, including agentic coding tasks where it achieved ~63.8% on SWE-Bench Verified. It supports structured outputs, function calling, code execution, search grounding, and URL context, making it well-suited for enterprise, STEM, and developer workflows. However, it does not currently support image or audio generation in its stable release, and its higher computational cost and latency make it less efficient than Flash or Flash-Lite. It is available via the Gemini API, Google AI Studio, and Vertex AI.

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite

Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is a natively multimodal reasoning model from Google DeepMind in the Gemini 3 series, based on the Gemini 3 Pro architecture. It processes text, image, video, audio, and PDF inputs within a 1 million token context window and produces text output up to 64K tokens. The model targets high-volume, latency-sensitive workloads and supports visual question answering, image and document data extraction, content moderation, classification, translation, automated speech recognition, and agentic data pipelines. It exposes configurable thinking levels of minimal, low, medium, and high, which set the depth of internal reasoning applied per request and let developers balance response quality against cost and latency.

On benchmarks reported at launch, Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite scores 86.9% on GPQA Diamond and 76.8% on the MMMU Pro multimodal benchmark, and reaches an Elo score of 1432 on the Arena.ai leaderboard. According to Artificial Analysis benchmarks, it produces a 2.5 times faster time to first answer token and a 45% increase in output speed relative to Gemini 2.5 Flash. It also shows improved instruction following, higher audio input quality for automated speech recognition tasks, and support for structured JSON output used in data extraction pipelines.

Gemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite Comparison Table

PropertyGemini 2.5 ProGemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
OrganizationGoogleGoogle
Categoryclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2025Mar 2026
Context Window1.0M1.0M
Parameters
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$1.25$0.250
Output $/1M$10.00$1.50
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Document Question Answering
Image Tagging
Multi-Label Classification
Model Features
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Foundation Vision
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Visual Understanding
Overall Score
70.15%
68.66%
Avg Response Time11.87s1.86s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2941.1K
Median output tokens5656
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0060$0.0003
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
73.3%(11/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
77.8%(7/9)
Object Counting
20%(2/10)
30%(3/10)
Object Understanding
78.6%(11/14)
64.3%(9/14)
Spatial Understanding
78.9%(15/19)
84.2%(16/19)
OCR
Overall Score
78.6%
89.96%
Avg Response Time4.91s1.32s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens2901.1K
Median output tokens32310
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0036$0.0003
Focused Scene OCR
78.8%(78/99)
91.9%(91/99)
Handwritten Math
80%(8/10)
80%(8/10)
License Plate Recognition
90%(27/30)
100%(30/30)
Text Recognition
73.3%(22/30)
90%(27/30)
VQA & Extraction
75%(45/60)
83.3%(50/60)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology