Florence-2 vs Gemini 3 Flash+ 1 other

Compare Florence-2, Gemini 3 Flash, and 1 other vision model side-by-side. Test these models on Image Captioning, OCR, and Object Detection in the Playground.

Compare these vision models live

Run the same image across every model that supports a task and compare their outputs side-by-side.

Detect and compare bounding boxes across models on the same image.

Open Object Detection in the full playground
AzureFlorence-2
Run to compare this model.
GoogleGemini 3 Flash
Run to compare this model.
AnthropicClaude Opus 4.5
Run to compare this model.

Models in this comparison

Model Overviews

Florence-2, introduced by Microsoft Research at CVPR 2024, is an open-source vision-language foundation model designed to unify diverse computer vision tasks within a single sequence-to-sequence framework. Unlike traditional models that specialize in specific tasks, Florence-2 accepts both images and text prompts and outputs text for tasks such as captioning, object detection, segmentation, OCR, and region-based grounding. It comes in two sizes—Florence-2-base (~230M parameters) and Florence-2-large (~770M parameters)—and is trained on FLD-5B, a large dataset of ~126M images with ~5.4B annotations.

The model demonstrates strong zero-shot and fine-tuned performance, often rivaling larger vision-language systems while remaining lightweight and efficient. Released under the MIT license, all weights are publicly available, making it accessible for fine-tuning and deployment in applications like VQA, content tagging, accessibility, and research. Florence-2’s compact design, versatility, and openness position it as a practical alternative to larger proprietary multimodal models.

Florence-2 vs Gemini 3 Flash Comparison Table + 1 other

PropertyFlorence-2Gemini 3 FlashClaude Opus 4.5
OrganizationMicrosoftGoogleAnthropic
Categoryopenclosedclosed
Modalitymultimodalmultimodalmultimodal
Release DateJun 2025Dec 2025Nov 2025
Context Window1.0M200K
Parameters230M
LicenseMITProprietaryProprietary
Pricing per 1M tokens
Input $/1M$0.500$5.00
Output $/1M$3.00$25.00
Vision Tasks
CaptioningDemoDemoDemo
Object DetectionDemoDemoDemo
OCRDemoDemoDemo
ClassificationDemoDemo
Vision Language
Visual Question AnsweringDemoDemo
Instance Segmentation
Open Vocabulary Object Detection
Phrase Grounding
Region Proposal
Model Features
Foundation Vision
LLMs with Vision Capabilities
Multimodal Vision
Zero-shot Detection
Vision Evalspass/fail results · 67 prompts
Score key:≥75%40–74%<40%
Overall Score
74.63%
Avg Response Time9.85s
Median input tokensincl. image tokens1.1K
Median output tokens290
Est. cost / taskon this benchmark$0.0014
Defect Detection
73.3%(11/15)
Document Understanding
88.9%(8/9)
Object Counting
30%(3/10)
Object Understanding
85.7%(12/14)
Spatial Understanding
84.2%(16/19)

Output tokens (incl. reasoning) and est. cost / task are measured on this benchmark from a single low-temperature run, and shown only for models whose run covered at least 90% of prompts. Methodology